Public Wealth Financing Strategies and Options
Funding Strategy | Description | Where It’s Commonly Used | Strengths | Limitations / Notes |
Local Sales Tax (Local Option Sales Tax) | Voter-approved city or county sales tax dedicated to park or civic asset improvements. Can be time-limited or capped at a project amount. | Small/medium cities, counties with tourism economies (MN, CO, MO, OK, etc.) | Predictable revenue stream, scalable, spreads cost across residents & visitors | Requires state authorization + voter approval; best suited for capital, not operations |
Municipal Bonding (City/County Bonds) | Cities or counties issue bonds (general obligation or revenue-backed) to finance major capital projects. Paid back over years. | Cities improving parks, waterfronts, facilities | Large up-front capital; low interest rates; widely used | Debt service affects future budgets; requires credit capacity |
State Bonding / State Capital Investment | State legislatures appropriate funds through bonding bills for parks, trails, waterfronts, public lands. | Many states: MN, CA, WA, NJ, NY | High-value grants; supports large projects | Competitive; political; often project-specific |
State Natural Resource Grants (ENRTF / Stewardship / LWCF match, etc.) | Conservation and recreation grant programs funded by lotteries, fees, or legislative appropriations. | Land acquisition, shoreline restoration, ecological improvements | Can cover 50–75% of acquisition cost; leverages local match | Requires strong application; environmental criteria apply |
Federal Programs (LWCF, NOAA, FEMA, DOT) | Federal grants for recreation, coastal resilience, habitat, transportation/riverfront trails. | State parks, regional parks, coastal parks | Large-scale capital; resilient infrastructure | Multi-year process; heavy compliance requirements |
Philanthropy (Individuals, Foundations) | Donations or capital campaigns supporting amenities, buildings, endowments, or acquisition match funds. | Conservancies, city parks, capital campaigns | Flexible; often quick; can fund design-quality upgrades | Can be unpredictable; often for improvements, not operations |
Nonprofit Partners (Conservancies, “Friends of” Groups) | Dedicated nonprofit raises money, manages volunteers, supports capital projects, stewardships. | Urban parks, historic commons, natural areas | Builds long-term community support; supplements city funding | Dependent on leadership and donor base |
Endowments (Permanent or Semi-Permanent Funds) | Funds invested to generate annual operating revenue. | Land trusts, high-profile parks, museums | Stable long-term operating revenue | Requires large fundraising capacity |
Bridge Loans (Land Trust Acquisition Financing) | Short-term loans used by land trusts to secure land until grants/donations arrive. | Conservation purchases, urgent acquisitions | Allows quick purchase; prevents land loss to developers | Must be repaid; interest costs |
User Fees (Parking, Marina, Events, Rentals) | Revenue from facilities: cabins, lodges, marinas, picnic shelters, beaches. | Tourist-heavy parks, waterfront parks | Self-sustaining for operations; equitable | Over-reliance can reduce access; not suitable for major capital |
Tourism & Hospitality Taxes | Lodging, tourism, or entertainment tax dedicated to destination parks. | Resort communities, high-tourism towns | Visitors help pay for shared assets | Requires state enabling laws; revenue fluctuates |
Public-Private Partnerships (P3) | Agreements with private operators or developers for shared-cost improvements, concessions, or facilities. | Marinas, amphitheaters, concessions | Brings capital & expertise | Must protect public access; contracts complex |
In-Kind Contributions (Land Donation, Price Reduction) | Donors give land or provide discounted sale price. | First acquisition of parks and open space | Reduces purchase costs drastically | Rare opportunity; relies on willing owners |
Federal Emergency / Climate Resilience Funding | Funding after storms/flooding for rebuild, shoreline protection, resilience upgrades. | Coastal and riverfront assets | Funds major infrastructure | Restricted to hazard mitigation categories |
Local Option Sales Tax (LOST)
What it is:
A local sales tax is an additional percentage added to the state sales tax, approved by voters in a city or county. In Minnesota, it’s often 0.5%, dedicated to specific projects like parks, trails, or downtown improvements. This type of funding is not available in all states.
How it works:
Local approval process: The city proposes a project and requests authorization from the state legislature to hold a referendum.
Voter referendum: Residents vote to approve or reject the tax.
Dedicated revenue stream: Once approved, the local sales tax is collected on applicable retail sales in that jurisdiction.
Restricted use: Funds can only be used for the voter-approved projects (e.g., Excelsior Commons improvements or Lumberjack Landing riverfront park).
Time or dollar cap: The tax usually expires once the total authorized amount is collected (e.g., $7M or 25 years, whichever comes first).
Advantages:
Predictable, locally controlled revenue stream.
Doesn’t increase property tax.
Tends to be popular when tied to a tangible local project.
Can be used to leverage matching grants.
Limitations:
Subject to legislative and voter approval.
Collection depends on local retail activity (economic cycles matter).
Time-limited, not a permanent funding source.
Not available in all states
Examples:
Excelsior Commons — $7M authorized via LOST (2019).
Lumberjack Landing — $6.2M projected LOST revenue (2024).
Bonding (State or City Bonds)
What it is:
Bonding is essentially borrowing money upfront to pay for major capital projects, then repaying the debt over time (usually 10–30 years) with interest. There are two main types relevant here:
State bonding: State government issues bonds and provides funds to local governments for qualified projects.
City bonding (municipal bonds): Local governments issue their own bonds, repaid through local revenue (property taxes, levies, etc.).
How it works:
A government entity authorizes a bond issue (sometimes requiring voter approval, sometimes not depending on the state and purpose).
Investors buy the bonds (essentially lending money).
The government uses the bond proceeds for capital projects (e.g., land acquisition, infrastructure, park facilities).
The government pays the bondholders back over time with interest.
Advantages:
Provides large upfront capital for projects that need to happen now.
Spreads costs over the useful life of the asset.
Can be combined with other funding sources (grants, philanthropy).
Limitations:
Creates long-term debt obligations.
Requires creditworthiness and legal authority to issue.
Bond repayment can increase local taxes or divert other budget resources.
Examples:
Ojiketa Regional Park — $1.5M in city bonds and $500K in state bonding helped acquire the former camp site.
Philanthropy & Nonprofit Fundraising
What it is:
Funding through private donations, foundation grants, and community fundraising campaigns, often managed by a nonprofit partner or conservancy.
How it works:
A nonprofit or “friends of the park” group organizes campaigns.
Individuals, businesses, or foundations contribute funds (often tax-deductible).
Funds may be used directly for acquisition or matched against public dollars.
Some nonprofits build endowments to provide ongoing stewardship funding.
Advantages:
Flexible, often faster than public processes.
Builds community ownership and engagement.
Can support both capital projects and ongoing stewardship.
Limitations:
Unpredictable revenue—depends on donor interest and capacity.
Typically not sufficient alone for large infrastructure projects.
Requires organizational capacity to manage campaigns.
Examples:
Community for the Commons supporting Excelsior Commons improvements.
Standing Cedars Land Conservancy, which raised $200K for the Englewood parcel through donors and internal endowment funds.
State and Federal Grants / Programs
What it is:
Competitive grant programs offered by state or federal agencies to support public projects — especially conservation, parks, water resources, trails, and recreation.
How it works:
Cities, counties, nonprofits, or park districts apply to programs (e.g., state bonding bills, DNR Metro Greenways, Land & Water Conservation Fund).
Awards are typically matching grants, requiring some local match (e.g., 50/50).
Funds are restricted to specific eligible uses (e.g., land acquisition, habitat restoration, ADA accessibility improvements).
Advantages:
Reduces local funding burden.
Encourages collaboration and matching funds.
Often supports conservation and infrastructure priorities.
Limitations:
Competitive application process.
Reimbursement model (locals pay upfront, get reimbursed).
Project must fit grant criteria.
Examples:
Ojiketa Regional Park received MN DNR Metro Greenways funding ($100K).
State bonding grants have supported several of these sites.
Endowment / Bridge Loan Model (Land Trusts)
What it is:
Land trusts and conservancies often use their endowment funds (investment income) or short-term bridge loans to act quickly to acquire land. They then raise funds to repay the loan or replenish the endowment.
How it works:
Conservancy uses internal funds to secure land quickly.
Fundraising campaign or grants follow to cover cost.
Property is placed under long-term conservation management.
Advantages:
Highly flexible and fast.
Doesn’t require government approval or public vote.
Ideal for strategic land acquisition in competitive real estate markets.
Limitations:
Requires a strong nonprofit with capital reserves.
Risk if fundraising falls short.
Usually limited to land acquisition, not large infrastructure.
Examples:
Standing Cedars Land Conservancy used endowment/bridge funds to buy the Englewood property, then raised ~$200K to repay.
Note: Content summarized with assistance from ChatGPT. ChatGPT can make mistakes-- check important information.